Indivior Settles for $385M in Opioid Monopoly Case – Legal Analysis

Fact checked

Indivior’s $385 Million Settlement: A Landmark in Opioid Litigation 

Indivior PLC’s recent agreement to pay $385 million to settle U.S. lawsuits brought by drug wholesalers marks a significant development in legal battles surrounding opioid addiction treatments. This settlement concludes a series of litigations against the pharmaceutical company, which has faced allegations of illegally suppressing generic competition for its opioid addiction treatment, Suboxone. 

Key Points: 

  • Substantial Settlement: Indivior agreed to a hefty $385 million settlement, reflecting the gravity of the accusations regarding its opioid treatment Suboxone.
  • Impact on Share Value: The announcement of this settlement interestingly led to a 5% increase in Indivior’s London-listed shares, indicating market relief at the resolution of long-standing legal disputes.
  • Previous Agreements: This settlement follows Indivior’s previous agreements, including a $102.5 million settlement with U.S. states and a $30 million class action lawsuit settlement related to similar claims.
  • Patent Practices Scrutinized: The lawsuit alleged that Indivior attempted to extend its Suboxone monopoly by transitioning from tablet to film versions, stifling generic competition.
  • Broader Opioid Crisis Context: This legal development occurs against the backdrop of the ongoing opioid crisis in the U.S., where over 900,000 overdose deaths have been recorded since 1999.

The recent resolution of the decade-long litigation provides more certainty for Indivior’s stakeholders but doesn’t involve an admission of liability from the company. The settlement, awaiting approval from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, is expected to be paid in the upcoming month. 

Indivior’s legal battles over Suboxone, approved in 2002 with exclusive selling rights until 2009, underscore the complex relationship between pharmaceutical patents, public health, and the law. The suit claimed Indivior’s switch to a film version was a strategy to maintain its market dominance, just as lower-cost generic pills were about to become available. 

The case is a critical example of the legal challenges pharmaceutical companies can face over patent practices and drug marketing strategies. In 2020, Indivior agreed to pay $600 million to resolve U.S. government allegations of fraudulently marketing Suboxone, including claims that the film version was safer and less prone to abuse than other drugs. 

This settlement is a reminder of the immense impact of opioid addiction in the U.S. and the legal implications for pharmaceutical companies involved in opioid production and marketing. It highlights the delicate balance required in enforcing patent rights while ensuring access to affordable healthcare and prioritizing public health interests. 


Powered by Lawsuits.org

Get a free legal case review today

This is a third party advertisement, and not an endorsement for legal services by TheLegalJournal.com
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Related Stories