Legal Perils in the Digital Age: New Mexico’s Accusations Against Meta for Child Endangerment

Fact checked

Understanding the Legal Implications of New Mexico’s Lawsuit Against Meta Platforms

In a significant legal development, the state of New Mexico has filed a lawsuit against Meta Platforms, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, accusing them of fostering an unsafe environment for children. The complaint, spearheaded by New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez, alleges that Meta has negligently allowed its platforms to become a “marketplace for predators,” significantly endangering the welfare of minors. 

Key Points:  

  • Lawsuit Allegations: New Mexico has filed a lawsuit against Meta Platforms, accusing them of failing to protect children on Facebook and Instagram. The state alleges that Meta’s platforms have become a marketplace for predators targeting minors. 
  • Investigation Findings: The New Mexico Attorney General’s office conducted an investigation using test accounts posing as teenagers and preteens. These accounts were reportedly inundated with sexual propositions and explicit content, indicating a failure in Meta’s protective measures. 
  • Meta’s Response: Meta Platforms has stated that they prioritize child safety, claiming to use sophisticated technology and collaborate with child safety experts and law enforcement to safeguard young users. 
  • Previous Safety Efforts: Despite establishing a child-safety task force and claiming to have removed thousands of problematic groups, Meta continues to face scrutiny over the effectiveness of its measures in protecting children from online predators and explicit content. 
  • Broader Legal and Ethical Implications: The lawsuit underscores the growing legal and ethical challenges facing tech companies in protecting minors. It highlights the need for more stringent regulations and proactive measures to ensure digital platforms are safe for all users, especially children. 

The crux of the lawsuit rests on the claim that Meta has failed to implement adequate protections against the use of its platforms by children below the age of 13. Furthermore, it argues that Meta has exploited the vulnerabilities of children to boost advertising revenue, a serious charge that paints a grim picture of corporate irresponsibility. 

This lawsuit emerges in the wake of an investigation conducted by the New Mexico attorney general’s office. Investigators created test accounts on Facebook and Instagram, posing as teenagers or preteens, complete with AI-generated photographs. The findings were alarming: Meta’s algorithms allegedly recommended sexual content to these accounts, which were subsequently inundated with explicit messages and sexual propositions from other users. 

This isn’t the first time Meta has been in the legal spotlight for issues concerning child safety. Just five months ago, a task force was established to address child-safety concerns following a Wall Street Journal investigation that uncovered a network of pedophilic accounts on Instagram. Despite these efforts, recent reports suggest that Meta continues to struggle with eradicating these problematic accounts. 

A particularly disturbing aspect of the lawsuit is the case of the “Issa Bee” account. Set up to represent a 13-year-old girl, it attracted a multitude of adult followers who flooded it with sexually explicit content and invitations to join private chat groups. The account received graphic content, including images of genitalia, on a disturbingly regular basis. 

Meta’s response to these allegations has been to assert its commitment to child safety. The company claims to utilize sophisticated technology and work closely with child safety experts and law enforcement to protect young users. Yet, the New Mexico lawsuit paints a starkly different picture, suggesting that Meta’s efforts have been insufficient in shielding children from online predators and explicit content. 

The legal implications of this case are profound. If the allegations are proven, Meta could face severe penalties and be forced to overhaul its platforms to ensure better protection for minors. The lawsuit aligns with broader concerns about the role of social media companies in safeguarding the welfare of their younger users and raises crucial questions about the balance between corporate interests and social responsibility. 

Furthermore, this case highlights the growing legal and ethical challenges tech companies face in an era where their platforms can have far-reaching impacts on society, especially on vulnerable populations like children. It underscores the necessity for stringent regulations and proactive measures to prevent digital spaces from becoming hotbeds of illicit activities. 

In conclusion, the New Mexico lawsuit against Meta is not just a legal battle; it’s a wake-up call for the tech industry. It serves as a reminder that in the digital age, safeguarding children’s welfare online is as crucial as it is in the physical world. As this case unfolds, it will undoubtedly have significant ramifications for how social media platforms are regulated and managed, especially concerning the protection of children. 



  • Katherine Blunt and Jeff Horwitz, “Facebook and Instagram Steer Predators to Children, New Mexico Attorney General Alleges in Lawsuit,” The Wall Street Journal, December 6, 2023. Link to Article. 
  • “Meta Platforms’ Response to Allegations,” Official Statement from Meta Platforms, Inc. 
  • “Report on Child Safety Task Force,” Wall Street Journal Investigation, 2023. 
Powered by Lawsuits.org

Get a free legal case review today

This is a third party advertisement, and not an endorsement for legal services by TheLegalJournal.com
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.